Read e-book online A Linguistic Commentary on Livius Andronicus (Studies in PDF

By Ivy Livingston

ISBN-10: 0415968992

ISBN-13: 9780415968997

Because the oldest literary Latin preserved in any volume, the language of Livius indicates many positive factors of linguistic curiosity and increases fascinating questions of phonolgy, morphology and syntax.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Linguistic Commentary on Livius Andronicus (Studies in Classics) PDF

Similar medieval books

Biblical Commentaries from the Canterbury School of Theodore - download pdf or read online

This quantity comprises the 1st variation of a formerly unknown textual content that throws new gentle at the highbrow background of early medieval Europe. The Biblical commentaries characterize the instructing of 2 proficient Greek students who got here to England from the Byzantine East: Theodore, Archbishop of Canterbury and his colleague Hadrian.

Download PDF by Micaela Janan: Reflections in a Serpent's Eye: Thebes in Ovid's

Ovid's striking tale of Thebes' founding and bloody unravelling spans books of his epic poem, the Metamorphoses. His weird and wonderful refractions of the well-ordered group have interaction Ovid's personal Rome and the mythohistory of the everlasting City's origins, so much really as framed in Vergil's Aeneid (Vergil's poem attained nonpareil prestige because the Latin epic quickly after publication).

New PDF release: Classics and the Uses of Reception (Classical Receptions)

This landmark assortment provides a wide selection of viewpoints at the price and function of reception thought in the sleek self-discipline of classics. A pioneering assortment, the function reception conception performs, or may well play, in the sleek self-discipline of classics. Emphasizes theoretical points of reception.

Download e-book for iPad: Quintus Smyrnaeus' Posthomerica: Engaging Homer in Late by Calum Maciver

Quintus Smyrnaeus' Posthomerica (3rd century C. E. ), the 14 e-book Greek epic at the Trojan struggle, is a textual content which has characteristically been missed primarily canon of Classical authors, and in reality until eventually only in the near past has been principally overlooked as a literary paintings. This booklet, the 1st monograph in English at the poem seeing that 1904, examines the Posthomerica's shut courting with the Homeric epics, with a spotlight at the originality and past due vintage interpretative bias of Quintus in his readings and emulation of Homer.

Extra resources for A Linguistic Commentary on Livius Andronicus (Studies in Classics)

Sample text

One such causative is vege re ‘to cause to be lively’. Among the iteratives, we find mede r i ‘to heal’ from *med - ‘measure’, although the o -grade of this root is well attested in Latin modus , modestus, and moderare . 7 Of course, in the case of mere%to- , vowel weakening does eventually prevail, giving the more familiar form merito- . 8 Hence, mereo(r) is morphologically compatible with the causatives and iteratives, but its meaning must be considered. Since mereo(r) cannot be interpreted as ‘cause to apportion’, it would be necessary to classify it with the iteratives, if the -e - of its stem goes back to *- e´i' e=o-.

By the same token, rubetum should, in the first instance, have meant ‘red thing’. Now rubus can mean both the blackberry and the prickly shrub on which it grows. Of course, despite the English name, the color of the fruit in question plausibly falls within the range of the root *h1 reu' d h-. Rubus itself goes back to *(h1 )rud h-o- and is likely to be old, since it has an exact cognate in Lith. 29 The sequence of events can be imagined in the following way. The substantivized adjective rubetum was adopted as a word for a patch of ‘red stuff ’ consisting of one or more bramble-bushes covered with their reddish fruit.

Skt. smarate ‘remembers’. See Div. 69 (Quod item dici de Moneta potest ; a qua praeterquam de sue plena quid umquam moniti sumus? 101. 8. The definitions are taken from the OLD , except where otherwise noted. This would be a feminine variant of myrte¯tum and occurs only at Vid . 93 (nescio qui servos e myrteta prosilit ). ) or may have arisen as a misinterpretation of the neuter nom. and acc. pl. The OLD suggests that Priscian has simply misquoted the text. It is somewhat interesting to note that each of the doublets olea and ol i¯va , both meaning ‘olive-tree’ and ‘olive’ has its own -e¯tum noun.

Download PDF sample

A Linguistic Commentary on Livius Andronicus (Studies in Classics) by Ivy Livingston

by Kenneth

Rated 4.95 of 5 – based on 7 votes